Tag Archives: 4 stars

jurassic_world_ver2_xlgJurassic World is a sequel 14 years in the making. And it was well worth the wait. The fourth installment in the Jurassic Park franchise has gone through many iterations. It started out as a simple story about procuring the lost shaving cream can from the old island. Then for a short while it was going to be a horrific film about monster human-dinosaur hybrids designed to be used for war.

When writers Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver, the brilliant minds behind the Rise of the Planet of the Apes film, took the reins a few years ago I was excited. Excited to see some clever voices take control of a flailing sequel that had been greenlit so many times in a decade it could make your head spin. When they were finished with the script some story points leaked on the web about a working theme park with a Sea World type show featuring a water dinosaur eating a great white shark and a plot revolving around trained velociraptors helping to track down a new type of killer dinosaur loose on the island. Once Colin Trevorrow was hired as director he explained in interviews that they needed more time so he could completely re-write the script from scratch. (Yet we still have a Sea World type show where a water dinosaur eats a great white shark and trained raptors help stop a new killer dino, so not sure how much he re-wrote.)

Mosasaur_Feeding_Show

I'm a huge fan of the original Jurassic Park. Clearly I'm not alone. It is the film that made me want to make movies. It incorporates two of my biggest loves: dinosaurs and theme parks. And it was by my favorite director, the great Steven Spielberg. It had it all. When I saw it at midnight on June 11th, 1993 it blew my, then twelve-year-old, mind. When I found out there was going to be a sequel in 1997, I went nuts. I bought all the toys. I hung up posters, cereal boxes, candy containers, and anything with The Lost World branding on it. And at Memorial Day weekend my friends and I saw the midnight showing, only to walk out of the theater saying, "eh".

Eighteen years later and Jurassic World is coming out. Once again I buy the poster, I buy the toys. I buy candy and anything with the Jurassic World branding on it, and I see the early showing the day before and walk out of the theater and say, "hell yes!" This is the sequel to Jurassic Park I have been waiting exactly 22 years for. This is the best Jurassic Park film, since Jurassic Park.

-1x-1

Jurassic World is a Jurassic Park film for Jurassic Park fans made by a Jurassic Park fan. It's almost entirely fan-service, (except for a sub-plot that feels a lot like Universal mandated that they shove in there.) We get to finally see a working dinosaur theme park. We get to experience what it might be like to visit and touch these animals. And most importantly for me, we get to re-visit the place where it all started, Isla Nublar, the island from the first movie. The subsequent films took place on Isla Sorna, a land of bland jungle.

But the nostalgia factor is a double-edged sword. While paying so much homage to the original film, Jurassic World has trouble creating its own voice, and sometimes feels a bit like an imitation or a reboot. You get the feeling that it isn't as authentic, much like the undeserved sequel Indiana Jones 4 and the Quest for More Money. However these complaints are actually answered in Jurassic World itself, by Jake Johnson's character, that stands in for the audience, calling out Jurassic World for not being as "legit" as the original Jurassic Park. "They didn't need hybrids back then". And he's right. The film gets a little meta here and there, giving so many nods to the original film that it's shaking its head up and down the whole movie.

jworldrexbig-jurassic-world-hunt-indominus-rex

It's a fun popcorn movie. It's a blast the whole way through. You're strapped in and ready for the ride from the very beginning. I loved every minute of it and I'll watch it again and again. But it lacks some soul. It's a bit too glossy, and at times feels a bit piecemealed together. You can tell it's a fifth or sixth iteration of an idea for a sequel. There are subplots thrown in for no reason other than to either satisfy a studio requirement or lay the groundwork for inevitable sequels. Some of the characters are underdeveloped, and worst of all, there is no true protagonist.

In Jurassic Park, from the beginning we meet Alan Grant and Ellie Sattler. They are the main characters and we see the events of (almost) the entire film through their eyes. We arrive to the park with them, seeing it all for the first time when they do. When they split up, we follow Alan's story lost in the park with the kids and we follow Ellie's story back at the control room trying to reboot the park. Then they come back together for a satisfying third act. In Jurassic World, we start by following two children as they arrive to the park. Then the camera flies across the island to the control room and we follow Claire, the head of park operations. Then we meet Owen, who is training raptors. Owen and Claire meet up, then separate, then meet up again. And every once in awhile we check in on the kids. There's no cohesive story flow. In fact, the only character we truly follow is the camera itself, as it flies from one part of the park to another trying desperately to connect a disparate story. By the end, all the main characters inevitably come together, but not in any way organically. More just because they have to.

maxresdefault

It's easy to pick on the problems of the film, but I do want to reiterate that I love the movie. It's eight-thousand times better than Jurassic Park 3, and I even like it more than The Lost World, which I have actually come to appreciate over the years, like a fine wine that gets better with age. The Spielberg films had something that JP3 and JW are missing though, and that's big set-piece scenes, both dramatic and suspenseful. The dinner table scene in the first film is incredible. Here we have five completely different characters simply discussing science, discovery, and ethics around a table, and it's one of the most riveting scenes in cinematic history. Another great scene is where John Hammond talks about his flea circus with Ellie while all the ice cream is melting (a metaphor for his dreams of a real dinosaur park dying around him).

There aren't many scenes in Jurassic World that last more than three minutes, so we never really dig in to anything. It's like the montaging of a movie, quick quip here, fast cut there, then action action action. There is a sweet moment with Claire, Owen and a dying Apatosaurus, but even that is brief and fleeting. The other type of big scenes missing are the suspenseful ones. In the original Jurassic Park, the T. rex escaping on the road is my favorite scene in any movie ever. It's long, scary, suspenseful, and there's not an ounce of music for ten minutes. It's just pure unadulterated terror. The Indominus rex breakout scene in Jurassic World has a similar feel, but comes up short (literally, it's a rather quick scene, as most are in the film). Even The Lost World has an intense scene with the two rexes attacking the RV. When Julianne Moore's character is laying on the glass while it's cracking around her I am on the edge of my seat. That sequence clocks in at nearly 15 minutes. Jurassic World could've used something like that early on, rather than jumping around so much.

SW00020Resized-720x359

It's for those reasons that I am giving this film four stars rather than five. It's still got dinosaurs, clever action, fun dialog and the best ending of any action movie I've seen in years, but it lacks the slowdowns, and long suspenseful sequences that the made the original a masterpiece. I adore the new score by Michael Giacchino. It's at times chilling and the new theme is just beautiful. I've been humming it in my head as much as I did the John Williams theme after the first film. Chris Pratt, was and always is, great. The effects were good, especially the new Indominus rex and the raptors. Some of the other dinosaur designs were a bit lacking and usually shown only in the background unfortunately. I've already seen Jurassic World twice in theaters and will probably see it again once more. Of course I will buy it to add to my collection on Blu-Ray. Here's hoping to see some deleted or maybe even extended scenes on the special features.

4 Stars (out of 5)

Even though this is a film about a dinosaur theme park, it's unfortunate that we don't really learn too much about dinosaurs in it. We do learn that keeping an animal in isolation its entire life can be bad for its temperament. We learn, once again, that raptors are smart pack hunters. But not much else. Dr. Henry Wu makes a point in the film that the animals of Jurassic World, and Jurassic Park, are not now, nor ever been, real dinosaurs. They would look much different, he goes on. But you wanted bigger, and more teeth. And that's exactly right. The Velociraptors of the real world would've been much smaller and covered in feathers for example, but this isn't a documentary. It's an action movie.

Mad_Max_Fury_Road_movie_posterHaving never seen any of the previous Mad Max films I was a bit hesitant to jump into this one, but after hearing such great things about Fury Road I had to see what the fuss was about. Fury Road is an amazing action movie, and the type of action movie you just don't see any more: One that isn't mindless mind-numbing CG nonsense. Even though this film is pretty much a two-hour chase scene, it still takes a few moments to let you catch your breath now and again. It has genuine character development. And it has a female character not just supporting the male lead, but actually holding her own. In fact, what is most monumental about the story is how the two main leads help each other, playing to each others' strengths, throughout the story. They use teamwork. Not a man saving a woman, or a woman saving the day despite the fact that she is a woman, but two people, working together, regardless of gender.

mad-max-fury-road-2-mad-max-epic-road-war-at-the-heart-of-fury-roadThe film's world is fully realized, yet never clumsily explained. Things just are the way they are, and we can enjoy seeing it, without having it shoved down our throats. Many of the big action set-pieces utilize practical effects, real explosions, incredible specially made vehicles, and even dummies rather than CG humans when the story calls for someone to kick the bucket. Sure there are some CG flourishes here and there, and even a big sandstorm that's all effects, but it's always done with the weight and reality of an old-school movie before computers took over. I enjoyed the story, characters, and the entire ride. And you don't have to be familiar with the prior films to get into this one as it's perfect as a stand-alone film. Would watch again.

4 Stars (out of 5)

Ex_Machina_Movie_PosterThe underpinning scientific theories described by the film are fascinating to me, and the film does a good job of illustrating them and their real-world importance. It's as beautifully stylized as any great science fiction film. The performances are believable on every level, from Oscar Isaac's reclusive, eccentric, and unpredictable inventor/millionaire, to Alicia Vikander's mysterious artificially intelligent being. Domhnall Gleeson ties the story together as the relatable every-man, Caleb, navigating this futuristic scenario through the eyes of today's tech.

The film explores the ideas of the Turing Test, the Chinese Room thought experiment, and the A-I Box Experiment, as well as modern dilemmas like tech companies using our personal data to do whatever it is they wish. All these concepts are meshed together into a science fiction story that plays like a cautionary tale more than your average Hollywood sci-fi, imparting the average movie-goer with some heavy philosophical ideas to contemplate after they've left the theater.

4 Stars (out of 5)

kingsman-poster-mainIt's great to see a spy film that's not afraid to be fun! With all the seriousness of the newer Bond films and the darkness or realism of other new spy thrillers, it's nice to see something more akin to the earlier days: campy, fun, and a bit over the top. Of course, as with Kickass, another one of the director's recent works, this film does feature quite a bit of violent, gory, action. But a gory, campy, fun spy thriller is just what I wanted and just what I got out of this one. Super fun. Would watch again.

4.0 Stars (out of 5)

birdman-poster1An incredible work of art that manages to feel unabashedly real while at the same time appearing profoundly surreal. Superb acting from Keaton as a washed-up actor trying to mount a Broadway play comeback while his inner ego tries to take control and change his destiny. In the end it's a film about leaving your mark on this world, with some commentary on the current state of entertainment and the overblown superhero film franchise phenomenon happening now. The star of the movie is really the incredible camera work and special effects, creating a seamless single take for the entire film, even though it covers several days of time. The film plays like a play, but with an intense beating pace, set to unnerving jazzy drums.

4 Stars (out of 5)

interstellar-imax-posterAn epic cinematic adventure rooted in some true science that seems more like outlandish fiction. This film is riveting from start to finish. The action sequences are intense yet the visuals are as serene and beautiful as 2001: A Space Odyssey.  Thanks to consulting producer Kip Thorne, an esteemed astrophysicist, most of the science of Interstellar is on point, something I was not expecting, but was pleasantly surprised to see. We get to see a black hole in the most realistic manner ever on film and it's gorgeous. They explain Einstein's relativity by having characters experience time differently depending on the effect of gravity where they are. Much like Inception where 10 minutes in one dream and years in another level, here we have a planet where 1 hour is equal to 7 years back home, yet, in this instance it's based in actual science, not fiction! Interstellar may not be Nolan's best film, but for a nerd like me, it's an experience I'll always treasure.

4 Stars (out of 5)

Nightcrawler_Movie_PosterA well-crafted psychological thriller that made me feel just as uncomfortable watching it as I was excited to see what happened next. Jake Gyllenhaal is haunting as the sociopathic Lou Bloom. Lou is an immoral man looking for his place in the world when he stumbles into the profession of freelance cameraman. The world of local news accepts him with open arms, despite the fact that his methods aren't always the most ethical. He is after all just giving viewers what they want, and they want carnage, blood, and spectacle. And he's willing to get it at any cost. The film is shot well, paced nicely, and chock-full of interesting set-pieces guaranteed to leave you unsettled and entertained. I look forward to more films from first time director Dan Gilroy.

4 Stars (out of 5)

Gone_Girl_Movie_PosterThis film kept me guessing and on the edge of my seat for its entire running time. It never felt long and it was always interesting. David Fincher directs the shit out of it, as usual, and the screenplay by the original novelist is fantastic as well. Technically the film is magnificent in every way and stunningly beautiful, even when it's trying be bland. The acting from everyone is spot-on, as is usually the case in a Fincher film, and the casting seems perfect. The story uses false narratives and misdirection to weave a plot that meanders in the best of ways, keeping you on your toes and well entertained. The score is a good mix of unsettlingly comfortable happiness and psychotic chaotic madness, much like the situations it plays over. I can never get enough Fincher. I wonder if he's going to be sticking to works based on novels from here on out? I'm certainly not opposed, and I'm loving the mystery genre when helmed by this genius.

4 Stars (out of 5)

Edge-of-Tomorrow-2014My favorite film for 2014 so far, this movie packs a punch! It's clever, fast-paced, well executed and even funny at times. I haven't been much of a fan of Tom Cruise as of late, just kind of burnt out on him, but he handles this material well. Emily Blunt does a great job and even Bill Paxton shines. The story is great and the action scenes actually had me on the edge of my seat, rather than numbing my brain with an overload of CG imagery. As the film goes on the characters get a little farther along each time, much like playing a video game and getting better as you go. It's a fun style that never really gets old because of the great directing. Much like the film this one is being compared to, Groundhog Day, it could've gotten old fast, but the filmmakers make just the right adjustments right before you get tired of something to make it fun again. Will watch again. And again.

4.5 Stars (out of 5)

The_Grand_Budapest_Hotel_posterA grand opus of a Wes Anderson film, this movie is beautiful, off-beat, wonderfully acted, and thoroughly entertaining. The storytelling is often silly, utilizing clever camera moves to pull off hilarious sight-gags, it's chock-full of fantastic one-liners, and there's some screwball slapstick scenarios, but they also take a few moments to throw in some more sentimental beats. The interesting use of miniatures and the switching between aspect ratios were also some of the unique flourishes that help set this film apart from anything else out there.

4 Stars (out of 5)